Operating Officer：Yasuhiro Nagano


Documents to be submitted (PDF, Gif) are as follows.



　　Additional submission on January 4, 2021



Facts of complaint (additional submission

I. Information on the complainantI

  • Facts of complaint (additional submission)


    • Appeal procedure clerk Human Rights Council Division Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations Office at Geneva Europe CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Email address is cp@ohchr.org
  • An inquiry


    • Reason for additional submission



    Facts of complaint (additional submission)
    January 4, 2021
    Japan
    6-18-9 Takahama, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi
    Yasuhiro Nagano
  • An inquiry
    • I replay the "Complaint Procedure form" below. Sent.
  • An inquiry
    • Secretariat of the Complaint Procedure of the Human Rights Council
    Then I received an email notifying me that I received the "Complaint Procedure form".
    Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:31:50 +0000

    Dear Sir / Madam,
    We hereby acknowledge receipt of your communication submitted to the Complaint Procedure of the Human Rights Council.

    ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・

    Below is the additional text.


    I read an article that translated the coverage of Agence France-Presse.
    "The process by which Carlos Ghosn was arrested and detained four times in Japan was fundamentally unjustified," a UN working group said.

    Experts in the working group are calling on the Japanese government to compensate Mr. Ghosn.
    "Europe 1" reported the news of AFP communication.・

    This opinion was posted on November 20th and published in the media on November 23rd.・
    Experts said, "The process of arresting and detaining Carlos Ghosn four times is fundamentally unjustified.
    Because he prevented him from regaining his freedom and enjoying other rights to justice.・
    In particular, he concluded that "it hindered the right to communicate freely with lawyers."・
    "The infringement of the right to a fair trial was so serious that it made Mr Ghosn's detention arbitrary."

    In addition, Carlos Ghosn was detained in a situation that forced him to say that he was involved. This is "presumption of innocence"! The principle of law that the accused should be presumed innocent until convicted on the basis of evidence!
    "It violates his rights," the group points out.

    In this regard, the UN Working Group
    Carlos Ghosn's deprivation of liberty from November 19, 2018 to March 5, 2019, and from April 4 to 25, 2019 violates:
    And the group expressed the view that it was arbitrary.
    Articles 9, 10 and 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
    It also violates Articles 9, 10 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    They report to the UN Human Rights Council, but do not speak on behalf of the United Nations. The Japanese government said the opinion was "not acceptable at all" and emphasized that it was "not legally binding."

    This group is a gathering of independent experts.
    No matter how non-binding it is, it is a report by the Working Group for the United Nations Human Rights Council.
    I think the Japanese government cannot ignore it.
    The future response of the Japanese government, the prosecution, the police, and the judiciary will be watched.

    I have made a "complaint request" to "OHCHR" in the past.
    However, "OHCHR" has been notified that it cannot be accepted because the Japanese government has not ratified the "personal reporting system".

    I think the lawyer of "Carlos Ghosn" is an American, but the "other party" of "report" is the Japanese government.
    Please treat my "claim of complaint" in the same way.

    ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

    The attorney of "Carlos Ghosn" has submitted it to the "Working Group on Arbitrary Detention", so
    I will also submit it to the "Working Group on Arbitrary Detention".
    ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

    Apart from the UN working group, I have called on governments and the media in each country to say that "Carlos Ghosn" is not guilty.
    They are calling on the Japanese government to "request" to withdraw "Carlos Ghosn's indictment."

    The grounds for "Carlos Ghosn" not being guilty are as follows.
    1) The "Securities Report" is prepared according to Nissan Motor's "Company Regulations".
    This "internal regulation" has "passed" the "regulation standard" of "Japan Certified Accountants Association" and "Tokyo Stock Exchange".
    The "Securities Report" has been approved by Nissan's "Audit Firm".
    The "Securities Report" is prepared by a person other than "Carlos Ghosn" according to "Company Regulations".
    The "Securities Report" has been approved by Nissan's "Audit Firm".
    The "Securities Report" is edited by the person in charge of preparation from the default in-house materials according to the regulations.
    Therefore, there is no "room" for "Carlos Ghosn" to "arbitrarily" make a "false statement" in the "securities report."

    2) The prosecution says that the funds for the purchase of a private villa were paid by Nissan Motor.
    However, even if the act of payment is true, it was paid according to Nissan's internal regulations.
    Payment is made by the slip of "Payment Request Form".
    Usually, "verify" with the voucher to confirm "validity".
    A "voucher" is an invoice or contract document on which payment is based.
    If necessary, it will be "collated" with the prescribed documents such as "minutes of the board of directors" and "approval documents".
    Therefore, even if he is the "top of management", it is impossible for Nissan to make a "breach of regulation" payment.
    If the prosecution's point is correct, Nissan executives and employees have "arbitrarily" committed "criminal acts."
    Therefore, it is not possible to punish only "Carlos Ghosn" unless the people involved are punished together.
    (Equality under the law)


    The prosecution's act against "Carlos Ghosn" is the same as "arbitrary punishment"
    that applies "support" (accessory crime) of "immigration law violation (out-of-qualification activity)" to me.

    The arrest and imprisonment of "Carlos Ghosn" violates Articles 9, 10 and 11 of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights".
    And because it violates Articles 9, 10 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, it seems that the UN Working Group has taken it up.
    "I" will also submit "additional materials" from "this point of view".

    ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

    Japan has not ratified the "reporting system".

    However, if Mr. Ghosn's attorneys François Jimerley and Jessica Finnell's "complaints" to the Japanese government were deliberated by the "working group",
    Please handle my "complaints" in the "Working Group on Arbitrary Detention".
    We will leave the handling to the Human Rights Council,
    such as treating it as an "arbitrary" "case" related to the "Carlos Ghosn case" rather than treating it by the "reporting system".

    ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊

    Look at the indictment.

    The "reason for crime" in the indictment states that it is a crime for us to provide a "false employment contract document" to a foreigner (Chinese).
    The indictment blames Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act for the crime.
    How to write a complaint. The four Chinese write the same way. (A, b, c, d)
    1) The fact that the Chinese engaged in "unqualified activities" that violated the Immigration Control Act.
    Article 70, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 19, Paragraph 1, Item 1.
    2) The fact that Yasuhiro Nagano created a "false contract" at LeftCO.
    Support (Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act).
    3) The fact that the accomplice "KinGungaku" handed a "false contract" to the Chinese.
    Support (Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act).
    4) The fact that the Chinese applied for renewal of their status of residence to the Tokyo Regional Immigration Bureau with a "false contract" attached.
    (Immigration Act Article 22-4-4).

    Under the Immigration Control Act, foreigners who submit "false employment contract documents"
    and obtain "status of residence" fall under the provisions of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
    For this disposition, the Minister of Justice will "revoke the status of residence" as an "administrative disposition".
    Therefore, a foreigner who has obtained a "status of residence" is not a criminal.
    If so, the person who provided the "false employment contract documents" is "not guilty".

    Therefore, a person who provides a "false employment contract document" cannot be punished for "accessory crime" in Articles 62, 1 and 60 of the Penal Code.

    I continue to insist on this.

    My claim is proved by the revised law. The Immigration Control Act was amended at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet Session and has been in force since January 1, 2017.
    An amendment law will be enacted that will penalize those who have obtained a status of residence by applying for false employment contract documents.
    The purpose of the revised law.
    Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for persons
    who obtained a status of residence by false application (former law Articles 70 and 74-6).
    The revised Immigration Control Act stipulates that persons who have obtained a status of residence
    by deception or other wrongful means (false application) will be subject to penalties (Article 70, Paragraph 1, Item 2-2 of the Act).
    In addition, with the establishment of the new provision, those who have facilitated the execution of the act of the provision for the purpose of profit,
    that is, not only the broker, but also the workplace,
    attorney, administrative scrivener and "school staff, etc." who participated in the false application.
    "Application agent" was also subject to penalties (Article 74-6 of the Act).
  • "About 2016 Immigration Control Act Amendment
  • "Applying the revised law to penalize those who have obtained a status of residence through false application

    • Proven by the 192nd Extraordinary Diet Session.
    However, in light of Article 39 of the Japanese Constitution and international law, punishment cannot be made "backward" to the "past."


    2017-3-24, proposed. November 30, 2021. 　Propose again

    　　

    Split-1

    FactSheet-0001x I

  • Please indicate which of the above procedures you are invoking

    • FactSheet-01

  • I. Information on the complainantI

    • >FactSheet-02

  • 4. In 2014, 15 years, the Philippine Embassy staff and Philippine　

    • >FactSheet-03

  • II. State concerned/articles violated　

    • >FactSheet-04

  • Ⅲ.Exhaustion of domestic remedies/application to other international procedures

    • >FactSheet-05

  • Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office

    • >FactSheet-06

  • I saw a document titled "complaint letter" submitted from the police to the general police

    • >FactSheet-07

  • I have seen 16 written letters (12 letters dated June 19, 2014, 4 dated on the 22nd of f

    • FactSheet-08

  • 7. I asked many Diet members for relief by letter or e-mail, but no response

    • >FactSheet-09

  • 5. Prosecutor A prosecutor against me

    • >FactSheet-10

  • With all of the above, we have taken all possible means in Japan, but it was noteffective at al

    • FactSheet-11

  • If your application has not been exhausted due to excessive extension, if it is

    • FactSheet-12

  • The Chinese embassy asked the Chinese embassy or Philippine embassy or home country

    • FactSheet-13

  • Have you submitted the same matter for examination under another procedure of

    • FactSheet-14

  • Ⅳ．Facts of the complaintI

    • FactSheet-15

  • I was able to live in Japan because I got my status of residence. Because I was able to live

    • FactSheet-16

  • Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1), Article 5 (2), Article 9 (1) of the International Covenant on

    • FactSheet-17

    • FactSheet-18

  • 3. Prosecutors illegally abused the authority they have about June 16, 2010, and I

    • FactSheet-19

  • Abusing the official authority and content illegal detention forms illegal detention and pressure on decision freedom

    • FactSheet-20

  • "What crime does not come to mind and is not doing criminal acts"

    • FactSheet-21

  • This is governance under the law, respect for fundamental human rights, compliance with international law

    • FactSheet-22

  • My argument is that the application of the "assistance crime" of the criminal law is a

    • FactSheet-23

  • Even if you obtain the status of residence of international and technical skills and

    • FactSheet-24

  • As a fact, since the Minister of Justice grants the status of residence at the discretion

    • FactSheet-25

  • In 2015, in Osaka, a Chinese international student whose status of residence is "studying

    • FactSheet-26

  • In Japan, we refer to such a far-cryptic reasoning theory as "the way in which Tablo is

    • FactSheet-27

  • Criminal composition requirement of official abuses of special public officials As to the suitability

    • FactSheet-28

  • As a principal offender (foreigner of illegal work) is imprisoned for illegal work

    • FactSheet-29/p>

  • Drivers related to the Philippine Embassy, which occurred in 2014 and 2015

    • FactSheet-30

  • The reason for not applying "illegal employment promotion crime"

    • FactSheet-31

  • Ⅴ．wrap up（ short sum- mary of up to 5 pages）

    • FactSheet-32

  • As an accomplice, Kin Gungaku (Gold Military Academy) approved the crime

    • FactSheet-33

  • "What crime does not come to mind and is not doing criminal acts"

    • FactSheet-34

  • It is not a "law of promoting illegal employment" which is a special law prescribing aid

    • FactSheet

  • FactSheet　-0001.pdf


    • 　　

    Split-2

    FactSheet-0002

  • Even if you get a status of residence as ucontent false employment cOntract“ ′i is separat

    • FactSheet-0003

  • Ⅵ．List of documents attachede

    • FactSheet-35

  • Even if you obtain the status of residence of international and technical skills and

    • FactSheet-36

  • Ⅵ．List of documents attached

    • FactSheet-37

  • ②. Criminal summary translation of public prosecutor against complaint letter


    • 　　

    2017-3-24Split-3

    1-Indictment

  • 1. Indictment - in English

    • 2-TokyoDistrictCourtruling

  • 2. Tokyo District Court ruling - summary - translation

    • 3-TokyoHighCourtruling

  • 3. Tokyo High Court ruling - summary - translation

    • 4-SupremeCourtrulingI

  • 4. Supreme Court ruling - summary - translation

    • 5-ThecomplaintsandaccusationssubmittedtoTokyoDistrictPublicProsecutors

  • 5. The complaints and accusations submitted to Tokyo District Public

    • /6-1-PoliceofficerscriminalagainstcomplaintletterNaganoYasuhiro

  • 6 ①. Police officer's criminal summary translation against complaint letter

    • /6-2-CriminalofpublicprosecutoragainstcomplaintletterYasuhiroNagano

  • 6 ②. Criminal summary translation of public prosecutor against complaint letter Yasuhiro Nagano

    • 6-3-PoliceofficerscriminalagainstchargesletterKinGungaku

  • 6 ③. Police officers' criminal summary translation against charges letter KinGungaku

    • 6-4-PoliceofficerscriminalagainstchargesofaccusationChina

  • 6 ④. Police officers' criminal summary translations against charges of accusationg

    • 6-5-PenaltiesPoliceofficersagainstPhilippinescriminal

  • 6 ⑤. Penalties Police officers against Philippines criminal summary translationing

    • 7-Relatedlaw

  • 7. Related law

    • 8-EmbassyofthePhilippinesCasenewspaperarticle

  • 8. Embassy of the Philippines Case newspaper article - summary -translation

    • 9-Chineses4formeroffensesandinformation

  • 9. Chinese, 4 former offenses and information on money military - translation Information on Chinese violation (assistance) entrance examination in 2010ng

    • 10-Reversiondocument

  • １０．Reversion document summary - translation

    • FactSheetAnnexI

  • I. Information on the complainantI.

    • YasuhiroNagano-passport

  • YasuhiroNagano-passport




    • The following is reference material


    1　Criminal offense against humanitarian affairs


    1. Summary of allegations

  • 1Humanitarian/１ Summary of the complain

    • 2. Facts of petition

  • ２Petition Fact

    • 3. The law on which the alleged crime (humanitarian crime) is based

  • ３International law to base on crime (humanitarian crime)

    • 4. Depletion of domestic bailouts Application to other international procedures

  • ４Depletion of domestic relief ・ Application to other international procedures

    • 5. Victim information of the complainant's crime

  • ５Information on 4 Chinese people

    • 6. Illegalness of aiding cases that violate the Immigration Control Act

  • ６Illegality of misappropriation case application law violation of immigration law


    • 7. News related to immigration law violation cases

  • ７Investigation Violation Incident Related News

    I. Information on the complainantI

  • FactSheet　-0001.pdf

    • 8. Important: Even the Minister of Justice cannot solve it

  • ８It can not be solved by the Minister of Justice



    • 2. 2. Immigration Control Act Violation Case "Related Materials"

    2　In violation of Immigration Control Act Related materials

    １．a bill of indictment

  • １Indictment.pdf"


    • ２．Tokyo District Court Judgment

  • ２Tokyo District Court ruling


    • ３．Tokyo High Court Judgment to dismiss the appeal

  • ３Tokyo High Court ruling

    • ４．Supreme Court "dismissing appeal" judgment

  • ４Supreme Court ruling

    • ５．Yasuhiro Nagano passport

  • ５Yasuhiro Nagano passport

    • ６．Yasuhiro Nagano Driver's license

  • ６Yasuhiro Nagano Drivers_license

    • ７．Related laws

  • ７Related lawt

    • ８．"Summary" of the Philippine Embassy Immigration Control Act Violation Case

  • ８Embassy of the Philippines Case newspaper article

    • ９．Information on 4 Chinese people

  • ９Chinese, 4 former offenses and information

    • １０．(Reason for return) Non-acceptance indictment / accusation

  • 10Reversion documen

    • １１．Philippine Embassy Case Newspaper Article

  • 11Embassy of the Philippines Case newspaper articles



    • 3. Immigration Control Act Violation Case "bill of indictmen · letter of complaint"

    3　Immigration control law violation case indictment complaint


    NO１　bill of indictment

    1　Immigration control law violation case indictment complaint

    Police officer crime against Yasuhiro Nagano

  • Police officers complain against Nagano Yasuhiro


    • Prosecutor's crime against Yasuhiro Nagano

  • Prosecutor's complaint against Yasuhiro Nagano


    • Judge's crime against Yasuhiro Nagano

  • Judge's complaint against Nagano Yasuhiro


    • NO２　letter of complaint

    2　Immigration control law violation case indictment complaint


    Crimes of police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. against KinGungaku

  • Charges of crimes against Kin Gungaku


    • Crimes of police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. against four Chinese

  • Charges of crimes against four Chinese


    • Crimes of police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. against Filipinos

  • Charges of crimes against the Philippines and others



    • NO３　Crimes that supported other crimes

    3　Immigration control law violation case indictment complaint


    Crimes that supported other crimes of lawyers against Yasuhiro Nagano

  • Charges of lawyers' crimes against Nagano Yasuhiro


    • Crimes that supported other crimes by the media against Yasuhiro Nagano

  • Charges of media crimes against Nagano Yasuhiro


    • Crimes that supported other crimes by a lawyer against Kin Gubngakus

  • Lawyer's criminal charges against Kin Gungaku



    • Crimes that supported other crimes the media did to Kin Gungaku

  • Charges of media crimes against Kin Gungaku


    • Crimes that supported other crimes by a lawyer against four Chinese

  • Lawyer's criminal charges against four Chinese



    • NO４　Abuse of Authority by public officer

    4　Immigration control law violation case indictment complaint


    Metropolitan Police Department police officer　Abuse of Authority by public officer

  • NO11　A complaint for abuse of official authority to a police officer


    • Tokyo Public Prosecutor's Office Prosecutor　Abuse of Authority by public officer

  • NO12　Complaint letter of abuse of the office against Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office


    • Tokyo High Public Prosecutor's Office Prosecutor　Abuse of Authority by public officer

  • NO13　Complaint letter of abuse of the office to the Tokyo High Public Prosecutor's Office



    • Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office Prosecutor　Abuse of Authority by public officer


  • NO14　Penalties for abuse of official abilities against the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office


    • Ministry of Justice staff　Abuse of Authority by public officer

  • NO15　 Complaint letter of abuse of the office of officials of the Ministry of Justice



    • NO５　a crime the libel

    5　Immigration control law violation case indictment complaint


    Posted on the internet　a crime the libel 　letter of complaint

  • Internet defamation complaint




    • Allegations and reports



    Metropolitan Police Department　Allegations and reports

  • １ ｓｕｍｍａｒｙ　ｏｆ the complaint


    • Chiba Prefectural Police Headquarters　Allegations and reports

  • 12Chiba prefectural police headquarters manager's report


    • Tokyo Public Prosecutors Office　Allegations and reports

  • 13Tokyo District Prosecutor's Attorney General


    • Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office　Allegations and reports

  • 14Tokyo High Public Prosecuttal Reportt


    • Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office　Allegations and reports/H3>
  • 15Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office report


    • Minister of Justice　Allegations and reports

  • 16 Judge Minister's letter of recommendation



    • Related sites



    Joint company future

    An inquiry



    Administrator:Yasuhiro　Nagano
    An inquiry